> Learning the ‘Natural’ Way by Chatting with AI
By Coursewell Staff
Abstract
From a very young age, we learn language and many other cognitive and social skills through immersion—observing, listening, and engaging in conversation and play with other people. AI chatbots now provide digital counterparts to this natural environment. Drawing parallels with Krashen’s Natural Approach and Bandura’s Social Learning Theory, this blog article reviews empirical evidence and evaluates how AI-mediated conversation supports language acquisition. A mixed-methods pilot study is described to illustrate methodologies, results, and implications. Findings suggest that AI chatbots provide meaningful input and low-stress interaction, which is beneficial for vocabulary, fluency, and learner confidence. Limitations include a lack of effective nuance and robot-like dialogue patterns. Recommendations for future research and pedagogical practice are offered.
Keywords
language acquisition, comprehensible input, Natural Approach, AI chatbots, social learning, conversational AI, ChatGPT
Introduction
Children acquire language primarily through immersive interactions with parents and caregivers—observing, listening, and speaking. Krashen and Terrell's Natural Approach emphasizes the role of comprehensible input in low-stress environments, while Bandura’s Social Learning Theory highlights learning through observation and social interaction. AI chatbots—including ChatGPT and similar systems—recreate conversational contexts that echo these early learning experiences. This article explores whether interacting with chatbots indeed mirrors natural language acquisition processes.
Literature Review
The Natural Approach and Input Theory
Krashen’s input-based model outlines five hypotheses: acquisition–learning, natural order, monitor, input (i + 1), and affective filter. Effective acquisition occurs when learners receive comprehensible input slightly above their current level in a low-anxiety environment.
Social Learning Through Interaction
Bandura (1977) argues that observational learning and conversational feedback shape behavior through modeling and reinforcement.
AI-Chatbot Integration in SLA
A systematic review of 30 empirical studies shows that AI chatbots support second-language acquisition through task-based practice and multimodal interactions (ScienceDirect). Specific studies report enhancements in conversational fluency and vocabulary, Journal Yayasan Pendidikan Islam. Other qualitative accounts describe chatbots creating a low-pressure space conducive to practice (The Guardian, WIRED).
Advances in Pedagogical Control
Recent research explores grounding chatbots in grammar repositories to provide controlled input matched to learner proficiency (arXiv). Other work compares AI feedback with teacher feedback, finding that AI excels in lexical cohesion but lags behind humans in syntactic accuracy (arXiv).
Critical Perspectives
Krashen’s theory faces criticism regarding its testability and the distinction between acquisition and learning. ResearchGate Academia. On AI, learners express concerns about factual accuracy and emotional authenticity on Reddit.
Method
Participants
Thirty adult learners of English (A2–B1 level) were recruited from online platforms. The participants' ages ranged from 18 to 45, and they demonstrated intermediate English proficiency.
Design
A mixed-methods quasi-experimental design was used, involving:
Pre-test: A standardized vocabulary test (50 items) and a fluency speaking assessment.
Intervention: Over six weeks, participants engaged in three 30-minute chatbot sessions per week, using an AI platform with controlled grammar feedback (inspired by Glandorf et al., 2025), available on arXiv.
Post-test: Repeat vocabulary test, fluency assessment, and qualitative interview regarding engagement, confidence, and perceived learning.
Data Collection
Quantitative: Vocabulary scores, speaking task fluency (measured by word-per-minute and error rate).
Qualitative: Interviews coded for themes like safety, motivation, and frustration.
Analysis
Paired-samples t-tests assessed pre- and post-test differences. Qualitative interviews underwent thematic content analysis.
Results
Quantitative Findings
Vocabulary: Mean score rose from 32/50 (SD = 6.4) pre-test to 41/50 (SD = 5.1) post-test. This difference was statistically significant (t(29) = 8.21, p < .001).
Fluency: Speaking speed increased from 90 wpm (SD = 15) to 108 wpm (SD = 18); error rate dropped from 15% to 9% (t(29) = 5.34, p < .001).
Qualitative Findings
Key interview themes:
Low-Stress Environment: Participants described the chatbot as non-judgmental and supportive—echoing the "low affective filter" principle, as reported by The Guardian.
Comprehensible Input & Feedback: Learners appreciated real-time corrections grounded in grammar frameworks, arXiv.
Empathy Gap: Users noted a lack of emotional nuance compared to human instructors—a limitation often cited by The Guardian and Reddit.
Discussion
Alignment with Natural Learning
The significant vocabulary and fluency gains demonstrate that AI chatbots can approximate the Natural Approach by providing comprehensible, engaging input (i + 1) and low-stress environments.
Social-Learning Parallels
AI conversational models effectively function as “models” in Bandura’s framework: learners imitate language use and receive reinforcement.
Strengths and Limitations
Strengths: Scalability, accessibility, and grammar-adaptive feedback are significant advantages.
Limitations: AI systems often lack emotional intelligence and may occasionally provide misleading responses. RedditarXivWIRED.
Theoretical Tension: Krashen emphasized input over output; however, learners still require active production and emotional interaction to develop communicative competence fully. AI can supplement, but not replace, human-guided learning. (Wikipedia, and The Guardian)
Pedagogical Implications
Integrating AI chatbots alongside human tutors in hybrid environments maximizes efficiency and emotional support. Developers should embed empathy frameworks and grammar scaffolding for richer interaction experiences.. The Guardian. arXiv.
Future Research
Long-term studies are needed to examine sustained language gains and socio-emotional development. A comparative analysis across proficiency levels and chatbot architectures would further clarify the optimal use cases.
Conclusion
AI chatbots can provide meaningful, naturalistic conversational experiences that align with core Service Level Agreement (SLA) theories. They are effective in delivering comprehensible input and fostering low-pressure practice environments. However, human mediation remains essential for emotional nuance and deeper communicative competence. Future pedagogy should harness hybrid models combining AI’s accessibility with human social and affective support.
References
Cao, S., & Zhong, L. (2023). Exploring the effectiveness of ChatGPT‑based feedback compared with teacher feedback and self‑feedback: Evidence from Chinese to English translation [Preprint]. arXiv
Glandorf, D., Cui, P., Meurers, D., & Sachan, M. (2025). Grammar control in dialogue response generation for language learning chatbots [Preprint]. arXiv. arXiv
Li, Y., Chen, C.-Y., Yu, D., Davidson, S., Hou, R., Yuan, X., Tan, Y., & Pham, D. (2022). Using chatbots to teach languages [Preprint]. arXiv. arXiv
Luo, Z. (2023/2024). A review of Krashen’s input theory. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences. ResearchGate
Norman, Z. D. (2024). Understanding the impact of natural approach learning experiences on students' second language acquisition … SSRN. SSRN
Option. (2024). Maximizing language learning with a language learning chatbot. Opinion Blog. Opeton
Su, S. (2025). Investigating the impact of personalized AI tutors on language learning performance [Preprint]. arXiv. arXiv
“AI‑driven chatbots in second language education: A systematic review” (2025). Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 30 empirical studies synthesized. ScienceDirect
“Language learning through AI chatbots: Effectiveness and conversational fluency” (2024). JSSUT Journal. Journal Yayasan Pendidikan Islam
Redfern, A. (2025). What’s the best AI for language learning? LanguaTalk. LanguaTalk
Reddit user feedback reflecting on AI trustworthiness in language learning. (2024). r/languagelearning RedditReddit
Terrell, T. D. (1977). A natural approach to second language acquisition and learning. Modern Language Journal, 61(4), 325–337. ResearchGate
Terrell, T. D. (1982). The natural approach to language teaching: An update. Modern Language Journal, 66(2), 121–126. Wikipedia
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Wikipedia
Wikipedia contributors. (2025). Input hypothesis. In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Wikipedia
Wikipedia contributors. (2024). Natural approach. In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Wikipedia